Work with me

The work starts where the demo stops.

I put AI into organisations that already have a business to run. The rules, the messy data and the people all come with it. Getting something adopted there is a different problem from getting it working, and it is the one I spend my time on.

There are five reasons people call me. You will usually need one of them. Sometimes they run in order.

Highly regulated environments25 years deliveringSafety-critical deliveryIndependent

What you can bring me

Five starting points.

01 / what to build

Figuring out what to actually build

You have been told to "do something with AI" and nobody agrees what.

The hard part was never the model. It is choosing work worth doing at all, and saying out loud which ideas will not survive contact with your data or your people. I come in before anything gets built.

What you get

  • Working out where the bottlenecks are, with the people actually doing the job
  • Each candidate weighed on what it is worth and what it will cost, reasoning shown
  • The ones I would kill, and why
  • A shortlist you can take to a budget conversation
A hand sorting through a table covered in identical grey cards, lifting one card outlined in red clear of the pile and pushing the rest aside.

Best fit: a leadership team under pressure to act, with no shortlist yet.

Read the full picture →

02 / data for AI

Fixing your data before the model reads it

The model is fine. Your data is not ready for it.

This is the part most people skip and most people get stuck on. AI does not sit on a tidy warehouse any more. It reaches into documents, mailboxes and systems nobody ever curated for it. Getting that estate into a state where a model can read it safely is most of the real work, and it is where I spend most of my time.

What you get

  • An honest assessment of what your AI can currently see, and what it should not
  • Permissions and oversharing surfaced before an assistant makes them obvious
  • Unstructured content made retrievable: structure, extraction, quality, metadata
  • Automated checks so the pipelines do not quietly degrade
A tangled heap of grey documents, folders and envelopes being drawn through a red comb that straightens them into a neat ordered stack on the other side.

Best fit: an organisation whose AI keeps returning the wrong document.

Read the full picture →

03 / build it

Building it once the idea is real

The demo worked. It died on the way to production.

I build with a toolset chosen for your constraints rather than for whatever is fashionable this quarter. Retrieval, agents, evaluation, monitoring. I care most about the unglamorous half: what happens after it ships.

What you get

  • The whole path, from the first script to something running in production
  • Logging, guardrails and evaluation set up before launch
  • An honest account of what it costs to run and where it breaks
  • Your team able to maintain it without me
A small prototype under a glass cloche beside the same machine rebuilt at full size, braced with red scaffolding and monitoring gauges so it can stand outdoors.

Best fit: a pilot that works in a demo and has to survive real users.

The AI engineering pipeline, in full

04 / govern it

Governing AI inside a corporate organisation

People are creating agents faster than anyone can approve them.

Governance is where most enterprise AI quietly goes wrong. Who is allowed to build an agent, and who is only allowed to use one. What leaves your compliance boundary the moment someone turns on web grounding. Which oversharing an assistant is about to make visible. These are not philosophical questions. They are configuration settings and access policies, and they have real answers.

What you get

  • Separating who can create agents from who can use them
  • Sharing and approval controls that people will actually follow
  • Where your data goes: residency, egress, and the boundaries a vendor will not draw for you
  • A lifecycle for agents, including the ones that should be stopped
Rows of identical grey robot figures queueing at a checkpoint where a red barrier arm admits some and holds the rest back.

Best fit: heavily regulated or public-sector teams rolling out at scale.

Read the full picture →

05 / teach your people

Teaching people AI, from the ground up

Your teams were handed the tools and never taught the thinking.

I teach assuming no prior knowledge and I never leave an acronym unexplained. Plain English first, the proper term second, so people pick up the real vocabulary without being made to feel stupid for not having it. Engineers who need to write working code, and leaders who need to ask better questions.

What you get

  • Hands-on engineering training: Python and the GenAI stack, keyboard first
  • Governance and risk sessions for leaders and approvers
  • Certification preparation for the Microsoft AI tracks
  • Materials your people keep after I leave
A person reading at a desk beneath a large assembly of grey interlocking gears, with the one piece currently being fitted picked out in red.

Best fit: a team that has the tools and is not getting value from them yet.

Read the full picture →

How it starts

Getting started.

Tell me what is actually on your desk. I will tell you whether I can help, what I think it really takes, and whether it is worth doing at all. If the project is a bad idea, or you do not need me, I will say so.

I work on my own. No bench to keep busy, no product to steer you towards. My bias is towards the smallest thing that proves the point, and towards leaving your team able to carry it without me.